Supreme Court Overview: February 2025

As February 2025 unfolds, the United States Supreme Court is tackling a docket brimming with cases that could reshape the nation's legal landscape. From debates over digital dance apps to discussions on do-it-yourself firearms, the justices are poised to deliver decisions that resonate across the country. Let's delve into some of the most compelling cases before the Court this term.

1. Transgender Rights: The Tennessee Tango

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is examining Tennessee's law that prohibits gender-affirming medical care for minors. The state argues it's protecting children, while opponents claim it infringes on the rights of transgender youth. During December 2024 arguments, the conservative majority appeared inclined to uphold the ban, a decision that could influence similar laws nationwide.

2. Ghost Guns: Assembling Legal Boundaries

The case of Garland v. VanDerStok centers on the Biden administration's 2022 regulation targeting "ghost guns" – untraceable firearms assembled from kits. Critics argue the regulation oversteps executive authority, while supporters see it as essential for public safety. In October 2024, the justices seemed poised to uphold the regulation, signaling a potential shift in gun control measures.

3. Mexico's Lawsuit Against U.S. Gun Manufacturers: Cross-Border Crossfire

In Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Mexico seeks to hold U.S. gun makers accountable for firearms trafficking that fuels cartel violence. The gun manufacturers invoke the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields gun companies from liability. The Court's decision could redefine the responsibilities of gun manufacturers concerning international crime.

4. U.S. TikTok Ban: Scrolling Through Security Concerns

The Supreme Court recently upheld a law banning TikTok in the United States unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, divests ownership. The unanimous decision underscored national security concerns over data privacy, despite debates about free speech implications.

5. Online Pornography: Age Verification vs. Privacy

In Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the Court is evaluating a Texas law requiring age verification for access to adult content online. Proponents argue it's necessary to shield minors from explicit material, while opponents contend it infringes on First Amendment rights and user privacy. The outcome could set new standards for digital content regulation.

6. Religious Charter Schools: Public Funds, Private Beliefs

A forthcoming case will determine if religious organizations can operate publicly funded charter schools. Advocates argue that excluding religious groups violates First Amendment rights, while critics fear it blurs the line between church and state. The decision could redefine educational funding and religious involvement in public education.

7. Religious Tax Exemption: Defining 'Religious' Activities

The Supreme Court will consider whether Catholic Charities Bureau can opt out of Wisconsin's unemployment program, after a state ruling that its services aren't inherently religious. The case raises questions about what constitutes religious activity and how tax exemptions are applied to faith-based organizations.

8. Obamacare Preventive Care Mandate: A Question of Conscience

In Becerra v. Braidwood Management Inc., the Court is reviewing challenges to the Affordable Care Act's mandate requiring coverage of preventive services, including HIV prevention drugs. The plaintiffs argue that the Appointment Clause is violated, and the ruling could impact healthcare coverage and religious liberty claims.

9. LGBT School Books: Parental Rights vs. Educational Inclusion

The Court is set to address whether parents can opt their children out of curricula featuring LGBT-themed books. The case pits parental rights against anti-discrimination principles, with potential implications for educational policies nationwide.

10. Planned Parenthood Funding: States' Rights and Healthcare Access

In Kerr v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, the justices will decide if states can exclude abortion providers from Medicaid funding. The outcome could affect healthcare access for low-income individuals and redefine state authority over Medicaid programs.

11. Nuclear Waste Storage: Not in My Backyard?

The Court is considering cases involving the restoration of licenses for nuclear waste storage facilities in New Mexico and Texas. The decisions will address federal versus state authority in environmental regulation and could influence future energy policies.

12. Flavored Vape Products: Puff or Pass?

In FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, the Court will evaluate the FDA's authority to ban flavored e-cigarettes. The case highlights tensions between public health initiatives and business interests, with potential ramifications for the vaping industry.

13. Telecommunications Services Fund: Who Pays the Piper?

The Court will address whether Congress delegated excessive authority to the Federal Communications Commission's Universal Service Fund, potentially revisiting the nondelegation doctrine and affecting how telecommunications services are funded.

As these pivotal cases unfold, staying informed is crucial for legal professionals. NBI offers a comprehensive range of Continuing Legal Education (CLE) courses designed to keep you abreast of the latest legal developments. Whether you're interested in family law, construction law, labor and employment, or trusts, estates & probate, NBI's expert-led seminars and workshops provide in-depth analysis and practical insights.

For attorneys in every State, NBI offers upcoming CLE courses tailored to your jurisdiction, ensuring you meet State-specific requirements while enhancing your legal expertise. Explore our upcoming Live Online Webinars, CLE-Accredited Podcasts, or OnDemand courses and advance your practice with confidence.

This blog post is for general informative purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. You should consult with an attorney before you rely on this information. While we attempted to ensure accuracy, completeness and timeliness, we assume no responsibility for this post’s accuracy, completeness or timeliness.