Register For Course
Live Webinar Registration
OnDemand Video
Video Download
Course Book Download
Overview
Recent Case Raises Hard Questions About AI and Confidentiality
A recent federal court ruling held that non-lawyer communications with artificial intelligence (AI) are not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. This ruling is the first of its kind, and it creates new ethical risks for attorneys. Are you on top of the latest developments? In this updates course, our knowledgeable faculty explores the ethical implications of United States v. Heppner. Don't let AI become an ethical minefield - register today!
- Get an overview of the ethical risks raised by United States v. Heppner.
- Discover why the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine failed.
- Examine best practices for safeguarding privilege in the era of AI.
*Any mention of specific products in this program is intended as part of a general overview and does not constitute NBI's endorsement or recommendation of any specific product or provider. This program is not sponsored by any technology or electronics provider.
Abbreviated Agenda
- Overview of United States v. Heppner: Background and Ethical Context
- Attorney-Client Privilege: Why It Didn't Apply
- The Work-Product Doctrine: Why It Failed
- Preserving Attorney-Client Privilege and Confidentiality in the Age of AI: Best Practices
- Developing Policies on AI Use: What Attorneys Need to Know
- Key Takeaways for Legal Professionals
Credit Details
Credits Available
| Credit | Status | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Alabama CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Arkansas CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Arizona CLE |
|
1 Total |
| California CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Connecticut CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Delaware CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Florida CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Georgia CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Hawaii CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Illinois CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Indiana CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Kentucky CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Maine CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Missouri CLE |
|
1.2 Total |
| Northern Mariana Islands CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Montana CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Nebraska CLE |
|
1 Total |
| New Hampshire CLE |
|
1 Total |
| New Jersey CLE |
|
1.2 Total |
| New Mexico CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Nevada CLE |
|
1 Total |
| New York CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Ohio CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Oklahoma CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Oregon CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Pennsylvania CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Tennessee CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Texas CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Virginia CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Vermont CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Washington CLE |
|
1 Total |
| Wisconsin CLE |
|
1 Total |
| West Virginia CLE |
|
1.2 Total |
| Wyoming CLE |
|
1 Total |
Select Jurisdiction
CLE
Agenda
-
AI, Attorney-Client Privilege, and Confidentiality: Ethical Implications of United States v. Heppner
- Overview of United States v. Heppner: Background and Ethical Context
- Attorney-Client Privilege: Why It Didn't Apply
- The Work-Product Doctrine: Why It Failed
- Preserving Attorney-Client Privilege and Confidentiality in the Age of AI: Best Practices
- Developing Policies on AI Use: What Attorneys Need to Know
- Key Takeaways for Legal Professionals
Who Should Attend
This program is designed for attorneys. Paralegals may also benefit.
Speakers
Speaker bio
Moish E. Peltz
is co-managing partner of the New York City office of Falcon Rappaport & Berkman LLP. He co-chairs FRB's Digital Assets Practice Group and chairs FRB's Intellectual Property Practice Group. Mr. Peltz oversees coordination between the Digital Asset Practice Group and all other practice groups of the firm, to ensure that the firm's clients receive the benefit of FRB's full-service approach, custom tailored to the unique issues presented by the blockchain industry. He also advises numerous venture technology companies on emerging technology and blockchain matters, with a focus on the intersection of IP and blockchain. Mr. Peltz has been advising cryptocurrency ventures since 2014, and combines his knowledge of the blockchain with a decade of IP and business law experience where he helps entrepreneurs grow their businesses and brands and resolve disputes. His practice encompasses both transactional and business litigation matters. Mr. Peltz's practice also focuses on U.S. and worldwide trademark prosecution and enforcement, including litigation before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). His previous experience includes working at a premier IP law firm where he acted as trial counsel in numerous contested IP matters before U.S. District Courts and Courts of Appeal. Mr. Peltz has worked across numerous industries, including technology, energy and renewable energy, entertainment, media, and advertising, real estate, hospitality, education, cryptocurrency and NFTs, artificial intelligence (AI), legal cannabis (including hemp and CBD), and medical/health care. He has assisted entrepreneurs, artists, and non-profits with their various legal needs. Mr. Peltz earned his B.A. degree from Union College; and his J.D. degree, with Certificate in Intellectual Property Law, from University of Florida Frederic G. Levin College of Law.
TOP FAQs
How many Utah CLE credits can I carry over?
Effective July 1, 2026, Utah attorneys can carry over up to 6 hours of excess Verified CLE credits from their current compliance period to their immediate next compliance period. Ethics or professionalism credits may not be carried forward.
In addition, attorneys licensed in another MCLE state whose principal office for the practice of law is not in Utah, may fulfill that state's mandatory CLE requirement, as well as completing 1 hour each of Utah-approved ethics and professionalism credits, for their compliance in Utah.
Browse Programs for Utah
How do I access my courses?
Do you have options for attendees who are deaf or hard of hearing?
What happens if my course is cancelled?
Are multiple attendee discounts available?
When will the OnDemand be available and how long will I have access to the content?
What is included with my course purchase?
Will I receive a certificate of completion?
Can multiple people watch courses and request credit?
Have more questions? Please Contact Us
