Register For Course
Live Webinar Registration
OnDemand Recording
Course Book Download
or
Overview
How Not to Get Burned
Courts are already sanctioning attorneys for relying on AI-generated content that includes fabricated citations, misstated law, and unsupported analysis. And “the AI made me do it” is not a defense. This program examines how AI errors can lead to ethical violations, malpractice exposure, and damage to your professional reputation. Using real-world cases like Mata v. Avianca and emerging court rules, we break down exactly where things go wrong and what you must do to stay compliant. Protect your clients - and your license. Register today!
- Understand how AI “hallucinations” occur and why even experienced attorneys can miss them.
- Identify the most common AI errors before they make it into your final work.
- Analyze real-world sanctions cases, including Mata v. Avianca, and extract practical lessons.
- Learn what courts expect from attorneys using AI and where they are drawing the line.
- Develop internal policies and workflows for safe, ethical AI use in your practice.
Abbreviated Agenda
- AI Errors and Hallucinations: Red Flags to Watch For
- Ethical Duties at Risk: Applying Traditional Rules to Modern Tools
- Emerging Guidance, Court Rules, and Disclosure Requirements
- Real-World Sanctions and Case Studies
- Best Practices, Policies, and Checklists for Safe AI Use
Can't Attend Live?
Pre-Order the OnDemand
We will notify you when the ondemand recording is available.
Credit Details
Credits Available
| Credit | Status | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Alabama CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Arkansas CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Arizona CLE |
|
3 Total |
| California CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Colorado CLE |
|
4 Total |
| Connecticut CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Delaware CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Florida CLE |
|
3.5 Total |
| Georgia CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Hawaii CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Iowa CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Idaho CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Illinois CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Indiana CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Kansas CLE |
|
3.5 Total |
| Kentucky CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Louisiana CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Maine CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Minnesota CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Missouri CLE |
|
3.6 Total |
| Northern Mariana Islands CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Mississippi CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Montana CLE |
|
3 Total |
| North Carolina CLE |
|
3 Total |
| North Dakota CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Nebraska CLE |
|
3 Total |
| New Hampshire CLE |
|
3 Total |
| New Jersey CLE |
|
3.6 Total |
| New Mexico CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Nevada CLE |
|
3 Total |
| New York CLE |
|
3.5 Total |
| Ohio CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Oklahoma CLE |
|
3.5 Total |
| Oregon CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Pennsylvania CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Rhode Island CLE |
|
3.5 Total |
| South Carolina CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Tennessee CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Texas CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Utah CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Virginia CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Vermont CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Washington CLE |
|
3 Total |
| Wisconsin CLE |
|
3.5 Total |
| West Virginia CLE |
|
3.6 Total |
| Wyoming CLE |
|
3 Total |
Select Jurisdiction
CLE
Agenda
-
AI Errors and Hallucinations: Red Flags to Watch For
- What They Are and Why They Happen
- Fabricated Authorities
- Unsupported or Misleading Citations
- Misstated or Overgeneralized Holdings
- Analytical Errors/Incorrect Inferences
- Omission Errors: Failure to Identify Controlling Authority or Adverse Authority
- Outdated, Overruled, or Amended Law Presented as Current
- Jurisdictional Errors, Procedural Hallucinations, and Other Dangers
-
Ethical Duties at Risk: Applying Traditional Rules to Modern Tools
- Duty of Competence
- Duty of Diligence
- Duty of Candor to the Tribunal
- Duty of Communication
- Confidentiality
- Supervision
-
Emerging Guidance, Court Rules, and Disclosure Requirements
- Emerging Trends in Judicial Scrutiny
- Court-Imposed Disclosure Requirements for AI-Assisted Filings
- ABA and State Bar Ethics Opinions on AI Use
-
Real-World Sanctions and Case Studies
- Mata v. Avianca, Inc. and Beyond: Real-World Cautionary Tales
- Key Judicial Takeaways
- Malpractice and Liability Exposure
-
Best Practices, Policies, and Checklists for Safe AI Use
- Verification Protocols
- Prompting Strategies: Asking for Sources, Refining Outputs, Limiting Scope to Reduce Hallucination Risk
- Human Oversight and Review Checklists
- Law Firm AI Use Policies and Training
- Documentation: Verification Steps and Audit Trails
Who Should Attend
This program is designed for attorneys. Paralegals may also benefit.
Speakers
Speaker bio
Elaine Critides
is of senior counsel at Michael Best & Friedrich LLP. She is a trusted advisor delivering clear and practical advice on cybersecurity, privacy, AI, and consumer regulations affecting clients in tech, telecom, financial services, and other SaaS-based industries. With over 20 years of legal experience, Ms. Critides has developed deep experience in privacy law, data protection, and incident response. She has led the design and implementation of enterprise-wide privacy and data governance programs tailored to business strategy and regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, and the AI Executive Order. Ms. Critides' work includes building privacy-by-design frameworks, conducting data protection impact assessments, and aligning AI practices with ethical, risk-based standards. She helps data-driven organizations manage compliance and mitigate legal exposure across sectors. Ms. Critides has advised on post-merger privacy integration, developed cross-functional training, and led incident response planning under attorney-client privilege. She is passionate about helping businesses of all sizes navigate the evolving regulatory landscape and leverage technology to deliver innovative and secure solutions. Ms. Critides' approach combines legal insight with operational execution, ensuring scalable and sustainable compliance practices. She is certified in AI governance by the IAPP and advises on a broad range of privacy and cybersecurity matters, including: Privacy and security by design Consumer protection / Regulatory product review, Complex legal agreements with customers and vendors, Supply chain, Privacy policies, notices, and consent management, GLBA, CCPA, TCPA, Incident Response and General and Roles-based Training. Ms. Critides earned her B.A degree from Rutgers University, her J.D. degree from Widener University School of Law and her L.L.M. in Communications & Antitrust Policy from Georgetown University.
Speaker bio
Ellen P. Blanchard
is a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP. She has extensive experience working with companies managing and protecting the data that is critical to their business, including information governance policies and procedures, data minimization and storage, cybersecurity, privacy and across all phases of discovery and the EDRM model. She has represented clients from a variety of industries in complex commercial litigation and government investigations, including Second Requests, involving securities, antitrust, healthcare, cybersecurity, telecommunications and IP issues. Ms. Blanchard uses her knowledge of the interconnections between legal and technology to work with clients on all phases of the EDRM continuum from records management to trial. She provides strategic advice that balances risk management with practical guidance for the business, particularly in the space of information governance and artificial intelligence. Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Blanchard served as director of discovery and information governance at an international telecommunication company where she was responsible for developing the strategic vision for discovery and providing leadership in managing the company's data. She led a team that was responsible for proactively managing electronic and document discovery for active litigation matters, including complex and high-stakes disputes such as mergers, government investigations, cyber investigations and class actions. A recognized thought leader in the industry, Ms. Blanchard regularly speaks on panels and participates in podcasts on the latest topics in the industry including data minimization, 2nd Requests, and artificial intelligence. She earned her B.A. degree from Ohio Wesleyan University and her J.D. degree from American University.
Speaker bio
Veronica Canton
is a partner at Pierson Ferdinand LLP. She is a cybersecurity, data privacy, and artificial intelligence lawyer who advises organizations on regulatory risk, governance, and compliance across the full data and AI lifecycle. Ms. Canton counsels startups, growth-stage companies, and enterprise clients navigating complex privacy frameworks, evolving cybersecurity obligations, and emerging AI regulations. A significant component of her practice focuses on cybersecurity incident response and regulatory crisis management. Ms. Canton regularly guides organizations through high-stakes security incidents, including data breaches, ransomware events, and unauthorized access matters, advising on breach notification obligations, regulatory exposure, risk assessments, and communications with government authorities. She works closely with executive leadership, forensic investigators, and internal stakeholders to develop defensible response strategies that mitigate legal, operational, and reputational risk. Ms. Canton is recognized for translating the rapidly developing legal and regulatory landscape into clear, operationally practical guidance. Her practice sits at the intersection of innovation, risk management, and regulatory strategy, where legal requirements must align with real-world business, security, and technical realities. In her prior in-house role as senior principal legal counsel, and global privacy and ESG manager at a global AI company, Ms. Canton led global privacy and AI-related compliance initiatives supporting connected and AI-enabled technologies across EMEA, APAC, and North America. She advised product, engineering, security, and executive teams on privacy-by-design, data governance, vendor risk management, and regulatory strategy. Ms. Canton's background as a SaaS startup co-founder further informs her commercially pragmatic approach, enabling her to align legal guidance with innovation, scaling, and business objectives. She earned her B.A. and M.A. degrees from San Francisco State University, and her J.D. degree from University of Notre Dame Law School.
TOP FAQs
How do I access my courses?
Do you have options for attendees who are deaf or hard of hearing?
What happens if my course is cancelled?
Are multiple attendee discounts available?
When will the OnDemand be available and how long will I have access to the content?
What is included with my course purchase?
Will I receive a certificate of completion?
Can multiple people watch courses and request credit?
Have more questions? Please Contact Us
