Register For Course
Live Webinar Registration
OnDemand Recording
Course Book Download
or
Overview
What Judges Actually Want (and Won't Tolerate) When AI Meets the Courtroom Featuring 5 Judges From Across the Nation
Judges are watching how attorneys use AI, and they're not always impressed. From hallucinated citations to missed disclosure obligations, courts are imposing sanctions and shaping new standards fast. This 6-hour program gives you direct insight into the judicial perspective: what courts are requiring, where practitioners are falling short, and how to use AI in civil litigation with confidence. Register today!
- See how courts nationwide are responding to AI, before a ruling catches you off guard.
- Get up to speed on AI disclosure requirements, standing orders, and emerging local rules.
- Handle AI-related evidentiary issues, from authentication to challenging opposing AI evidence.
- Know your ethical obligations around AI competence, candor, and confidentiality.
Our Distinguished Panelists: Hon. Gwendolyn N. Bright, Hon. Stacy L. Campbell, Hon. Crystal Eller, Hon. Jeanette A. Irby and Hon. David Najjar
Moderated by: Alexis R. Jani
Abbreviated Agenda
- From the Bench: What Judges Are Actually Seeing
- AI Disclosure Done Right: What Judges Want to See
- Filings, Briefs, and the Quality Problem: AI Writing Tells Judges Spot Immediately
- AI Evidentiary Issues Judges See More and More Often
- Discovery, Proportionality, and AI: Where Judges Are Drawing Lines
- Ethics of AI in Civil Litigation: Meeting Your Professional Obligations
- What Judges Wish Attorneys Knew: Practical Takeaways
Can't Attend Live?
Get the OnDemand Instead
Watch the recording of this event on your own schedule. We'll notify you when its ready.
Credit Details
Credits Available
| Credit | Status | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Alabama CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Arkansas CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Arizona CLE |
|
6 Total |
| California CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Colorado CLE |
|
7 Total |
| Connecticut CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Delaware CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Florida CLE |
|
7 Total |
| Georgia CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Hawaii CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Iowa CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Idaho CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Illinois CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Indiana CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Kansas CLE |
|
7 Total |
| Kentucky CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Louisiana CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Maine CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Minnesota CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Missouri CLE |
|
7.2 Total |
| Northern Mariana Islands CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Mississippi CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Montana CLE |
|
6 Total |
| North Carolina CLE |
|
6 Total |
| North Dakota CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Nebraska CLE |
|
6 Total |
| New Hampshire CLE |
|
6 Total |
| New Jersey CLE |
|
7.2 Total |
| New Mexico CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Nevada CLE |
|
6 Total |
| New York CLE |
|
7 Total |
| Ohio CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Oklahoma CLE |
|
7 Total |
| Oregon CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Pennsylvania CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Rhode Island CLE |
|
7 Total |
| South Carolina CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Tennessee CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Texas CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Utah CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Virginia CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Vermont CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Washington CLE |
|
6 Total |
| Wisconsin CLE |
|
7 Total |
| West Virginia CLE |
|
7.2 Total |
| Wyoming CLE |
|
6 Total |
Select Jurisdiction
CLE
Agenda
-
From the Bench: What Judges Are Actually Seeing
- AI in the Courtroom: Volume, Variety, and Early Verdicts
- The Hall of Shame: High-Profile Cases and Sanctions
- Attorneys Who Got It Right and What Made the Difference
- How Judicial Attitudes Vary Across Circuits and Jurisdictions
-
AI Disclosure Done Right: What Judges Want to See
- AI Disclosure Requirements Across Federal and State Courts
- What a Good AI Disclosure Actually Looks Like
- What Courts Mean by "AI-Assisted:" Defining Scope and Thresholds
- Proactive Disclosure as a Credibility Builder
-
Filings, Briefs, and the Quality Problem: AI Writing Tells Judges Spot Immediately
-
AI Evidentiary Issues Judges See More and More Often
- AI-Generated Evidence in the Record: Authentication Failures and Admissibility Pitfalls
- Evidentiary Standards Applied to AI-Generated Content
- Challenging Opposing Counsel's AI-Generated Evidence
- Expert Witness Considerations in AI-Related Disputes
-
Discovery, Proportionality, and AI: Where Judges Are Drawing Lines
- AI-Assisted Document Review: Judicial Acceptance and Scrutiny
- Predictive Coding and TAR Without Transparency or Cooperation
- What Courts Expect When AI Drives Your Document Review
- Privilege, Waiver, and AI-Generated Work Product: Lessons From United States v. Heppner
- Proportionality Disputes When AI Expands Discovery Scope
-
Ethics of AI in Civil Litigation: Meeting Your Professional Obligations
- Competence in the Age of AI: What the Rules Now Require
- Supervising AI Tools: Attorney Responsibility for AI-Generated Work Product
- Candor to the Tribunal and AI Hallucinations: When Errors Become Ethics Violations
- Confidentiality and Data Security When Using AI Platforms
- Avoiding Conflicts and Bias Amplification in AI-Assisted Research
-
What Judges Wish Attorneys Knew: Practical Takeaways
- How to Talk to a Judge About AI: At Hearing, in Conference, and in Writing
- Building a Practice That Earns Judicial Trust: Policies, Checklists, and Habits
- What's Coming Next: Anticipating Judicial and Regulatory Evolution
Who Should Attend
This legal course is designed for attorneys. Paralegals will also benefit.
Speakers
Speaker bio
Hon. Gwendolyn N. Bright
is a Judge in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.
Speaker bio
Hon. Jeanette A. Irby
is a retired Circuit Court Judge for the 20th Judicial Circuit of Virginia. She is currently managing director of Juridical Solutions PLC, where she mediates family law disputes which are most suited to alternative dispute resolution. Judge Irby is experienced in all areas of civil litigation, including complex business disputes, divorce (equitable distribution, spousal support and custody), and personal injury claims. Before going on the bench, she practiced law with her primary focus on domestic relations. Judge Irby earned her B.S. degree from Central Michigan University and her J.D. degree from Thomas W. Cooley Law School.
Speaker bio
Hon. David Najjar
is a Superior Court Judge in the Hamilton County Superior Court.
Speaker bio
Alexis R. Jani
is an attorney at The Bowling Law Firm, APLC. She is an attorney with over 15 years of experience in the civil litigation of medical malpractice, pharmacy errors, premises liability, personal injury and general liability matters. Ms. Jani is admitted to practice before all state courts in Louisiana, and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle and Western districts of Louisiana. She earned her bachelor's degree in political science from The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and her J.D. degree from the Tulane University Law School in New Orleans. Ms. Jani is a member of the Louisiana State Bar Association.
Speaker bio
Hon. Crystal Eller
is a District Court Judge in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County.
Speaker bio
Hon. Stacy L. Campbell
is an Associate Judge in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in the counties of Monroe, Perry, Randolph, St. Clair and Washington.
TOP FAQs
How do I access my courses?
Do you have options for attendees who are deaf or hard of hearing?
What happens if my course is cancelled?
Are multiple attendee discounts available?
When will the OnDemand be available and how long will I have access to the content?
What is included with my course purchase?
Will I receive a certificate of completion?
Can multiple people watch courses and request credit?
Have more questions? Please Contact Us
