Register For Course
Live Webinar Registration
OnDemand Recording
Course Book Download
Overview
Catch the Conflict Before It Costs You a Client, a Case, or Your License
Most conflict problems don't start with a bad decision - they start with a check that was rushed, a waiver that was recycled from an old file, or consent language that never accounted for how the matter would actually unfold. By the time the conflict surfaces, the options are limited: a disqualification motion, a malpractice claim, or a call to the bar's ethics hotline that comes too late to help. This course gives you a practical framework for catching conflicts before they catch you. You'll walk through how to build a conflicts-checking process that holds up under scrutiny, draft waiver and advance consent language that courts will actually enforce, and know exactly when an ethical screen will (and won't) cure an imputed conflict. You will leave with tested language, a defensible process, and the judgment to handle the conflicts that don't fit neatly into the rules. Register today!
- Get a clear read on how Model Rules 1.7, 1.9, and 1.10 define and trigger a conflict.
- Build a conflicts-checking system that creates a real paper trail, not just a database search.
- Draft waivers and advance consent language that hold up when a conflict actually materializes.
- Work through real conflict scenarios, including lateral hires, joint representation, and mid-case surprises.
Abbreviated Agenda
- Understanding the Conflicts Landscape: Rules, Triggers, and Risk Exposure
- Building a Defensible Conflicts-Checking System
- Drafting Waivers and Advance Consent That Hold Up
- Managing Conflicts Through the Life of a Matter
Can't Attend Live?
Get the OnDemand Instead
Watch the recording of this event on your own schedule. We'll notify you when its ready.
Credit Details
Credits Available
| Credit | Status | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Alabama CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Arkansas CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Arizona CLE |
|
2 Total |
| California CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Colorado CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Connecticut CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Delaware CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Florida CLE |
|
2.5 Total |
| Georgia CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Hawaii CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Iowa CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Idaho CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Illinois CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Indiana CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Kansas CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Kentucky CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Louisiana CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Maine CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Minnesota CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Missouri CLE |
|
2.4 Total |
| Northern Mariana Islands CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Montana CLE |
|
2 Total |
| North Carolina CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Nebraska CLE |
|
2 Total |
| New Hampshire CLE |
|
2 Total |
| New Jersey CLE |
|
2.4 Total |
| New Mexico CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Nevada CLE |
|
2 Total |
| New York CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Ohio CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Oklahoma CLE |
|
2.5 Total |
| Oregon CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Pennsylvania CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Rhode Island CLE |
|
2 Total |
| South Carolina CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Tennessee CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Texas CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Utah CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Virginia CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Vermont CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Washington CLE |
|
2 Total |
| Wisconsin CLE |
|
2 Total |
| West Virginia CLE |
|
2.4 Total |
| Wyoming CLE |
|
2 Total |
Select Jurisdiction
CLE
Agenda
-
Understanding the Conflicts Landscape: Rules, Triggers, and Risk Exposure
- Model Rule 1.7: Current Client Conflicts, Direct Adversity, and Material Limitation
- Model Rule 1.9: Former Client Conflicts and the "Substantially Related" Test
- Imputed Conflicts Under Rule 1.10 and the Lateral Hire Problem
- When Conflicts Checks Fail: Malpractice, Disqualification, and Bar Discipline Exposure
-
Building a Defensible Conflicts-Checking System
- Designing an Intake and Database Search That Actually Catches Conflicts
- Lateral Attorneys, Mergers, and Side-Switching: Special Screening Protocols
- Ethical Screens Under Rule 1.10: When They Work and When They Don't
- Documenting the Check: Building a Record That Holds Up Under Scrutiny
-
Drafting Waivers and Advance Consent That Hold Up
- Rule 1.7(b): The Four-Part Test for Valid Informed Consent
- Advance Waivers: Drafting Language Courts Will Actually Enforce
- Common Drafting Mistakes That Invalidate Consent
- Special Situations: Joint Representation, Common Representation, and Positional Conflicts
-
Managing Conflicts Through the Life of a Matter
- Applying the Framework: Working Through Real Conflict Scenarios
- When Circumstances Change: Reassessing Consent Mid-Representation
- Withdrawal and Disqualification: Damage Control When a Waiver Fails
- Building Firm Policies That Prevent Repeat Conflicts Problems
Who Should Attend
This program is designed for attorneys. Paralegals should also attend.
Speakers
Speaker bio
Lynndolyn T. Mitchell
is the owner of the Law Office of Lynndolyn T. Mitchell P.C. in Rockville, Maryland. She has been representing clients from all economic and social backgrounds in juvenile, family, misdemeanor criminal, and traffic matters in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia for more than 30 years. Ms. Mitchell has served as a senior assistant public defender in Virginia Beach in the Juvenile Division and Felony Trial Division, and deputy public defender in the Juvenile Division of the Riverside County Public Defender's Office. She has represented juveniles in delinquency and dependency matters in California, Virginia and Maryland. Ms. Mitchell served an assistant adjunct professor for the University of Maryland Global Campus (Formerly UMUC) in the disciplines of paralegal studies and criminal justice. She has extensive experience representing military families in all aspects of family law matters. Ms. Mitchell is a member of Maryland State Bar Association's Solo Small Firm Section, served as co-chair of the Education Law Section, and has served as a member of the School Board at Montrose Christian School in Rockville. She is admitted to practice in Virginia, District of Columbia, Maryland and Montgomery County. Ms. Mitchell earned her B.A. degree from the University of Irvine and her J.D. degree from Antioch School of Law, Washington, D.C. She has handled pro bono education law matters for the Maryland Disability Law Center.
Speaker bio
Jeffrey Gard
is a Colorado attorney with Gard Law Firm, LLC, specializing in marijuana law. He represents numerous patients, doctors and marijuana businesses throughout the state of Colorado, and has advised people from all over the country. Mr. Gard advises both state and local governments in their development of medical marijuana business regulations. He is widely considered one of Colorado's leading marijuana attorneys. Since the passage of Amendment 64 which legalized adult possession and cultivation of marijuana in Colorado, Mr. Gard has been working with state and local officials in developing regulations for the retail marijuana industry and was appointed by the state to participate in the rule-making progress. Over the last year, he has been working with the U.S. Congress to assist with an analysis of the federal code to determine the various areas which are impacted by the state marijuana laws, in hopes of reconciling state and federal law in the near future. Mr. Gard now shares his knowledge and experience with other attorneys and has given several CLE lectures on various aspects of marijuana law. He is a Colorado native and a cum laude philosophy graduate from the University of Colorado, where he also was elected Phi Beta Kappa. While attending law school, Mr. Gard won the William De Souchet Award for best individual performance in trial advocacy, and won a multi-state moot court competition during his first year of law school. After graduation, he accepted a position with a respected litigation firm in Boulder, Colorado and later formed his own firm in downtown Boulder, Colorado.
TOP FAQs
How do I access my courses?
Do you have options for attendees who are deaf or hard of hearing?
What happens if my course is cancelled?
Are multiple attendee discounts available?
When will the OnDemand be available and how long will I have access to the content?
What is included with my course purchase?
Will I receive a certificate of completion?
Can multiple people watch courses and request credit?
Have more questions? Please Contact Us
